没有莫德里奇和大中锋的米兰，还能算米兰吗？（少了莫德里奇与支点中锋的米兰，还是那个米兰吗？）

Answering football identity

I've got a question in Chinese about whether Milan can still be Milan without Modric and a big center-forward. This seems to reflect on football identity, humor, and transfer rumors.

In my perspective, Milan's identity isn't solely about individual players; it's shaped by club philosophy and history. Sure, having a classic number 9 is part of tradition, but modern tactics can adapt. If there's no Modric, the focus could shift to midfield control and creating opportunities through different strategies.Clarifying Milan's coaching and tactics

For the 2024-25 season, AC Milan appointed Paulo Fonseca in June 2024. It's important to note that he prefers formations like 4-2-3-1 or 4-3-3, focusing on mobile forwards rather than a classic target man, which means the team’s identity under Fonseca may not rely on having a big striker. I should also consider the possibility that the question might refer to Inter Milan, but it's likely about AC Milan. The talk about Modric being linked to Milan can be noted, but I want to keep things general and avoid making uncertain claims.Responding to Milan identity

I want to avoid unverified claims, so I'll keep it general. Starting with something like "当然算," which establishes Milan’s identity linked to their badge, history, and style.

Next, while big center forwards are valuable, they aren't strictly necessary. I can suggest alternatives for lacking a target man, like structured box occupation, inverted wingers making runs, and midfield late runs. Historical examples like Seedorf and Kaká’s era with Inzaghi show Milan's victories without needing a classic striker. Modric isn’t a historical Milan player either, but players like Bennacer, Reijnders, and Loftus-Cheek are current options for midfield control.